9/11/3 B.C.
Lots of theologians and commentators believe Jesus was actually born sometime in the spring, probably in 2 or 3 B.C. But several others believe the nativity happened in September, basing their calculations on—brace yourself—the constellations. In 1987, one theologian, the late David Chilton, pinpointed an exact date, down to the hour, based on his interpretation of Revelation 12:1-6:
"And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. 2 She was pregnant and was crying out in birth pains and the agony of giving birth. 3 And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on his heads seven diadems. 4 His tail swept down a third of the stars of heaven and cast them to the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that when she bore her child he might devour it. 5 She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne, 6 and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which she is to be nourished for 1,260 days."Chilton decided to study the ancient charts to determine when, nearest to the B.C.-A.D. divide, the stars would have aligned in such a way. Here's his startling conclusion (and remember, he postulated this in 1987 in his commentary, Days of Vengeance):
The position of the Moon in John's vision could pinpoint the nativity to within a day—perhaps to an hour period or less. This may seem absurd, but it is entirely possible.In case you're wondering, 6:15 P.M. Jerusalem time would be 10:15 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, meaning that Chilton, back in 1987, pinpointed Jesus' birth to a time coinciding within two hours of the Al Qaeda attacks on the USA that took place fourteen years later.
The key is the Moon. The apostle said it was located ‘under her feet.’ What does the word ‘under’ signify in this case? Does it mean the Woman of the vision was standing on the Moon when John observed it or does it mean her feet were positioned slightly above the Moon? John does not tell us. This, however, is not of major consequence in using the Moon to answer our question because it would only involve the difference of a degree or two. Since the feet of Virgo the Virgin represent the last 7 degrees of the constellation (in the time of Christ this would have been between about 180 and 187 degrees along the ecliptic), the Moon has to be positioned somewhere under that 7-degree arc. But the Moon also has to be in that exact location when the Sun is mid-bodied to Virgo. In the year 3 B. C., these two factors came to precise agreement for less than two hours, as observed from Palestine or Patmos, on September 11. The relationship began about 6:15 P.M. (sunset), and lasted until around 7:45 P.M. (moonset). This is the only day in the whole year that this could have taken place.
So what conclusions do I draw from such a coincidence? Well, first Al Qaeda has made it very clear that they are at war with Cristendom, because that is how they view the West. Second, that group is infamous for its love of symbolism and irony, not only in picking targets, but also in their methods of attack. Third, since they are Middle Eastern culturally, I believe it would appear obvious to them that St. John was using Zodiacal signs. Only pop-culture Americans are able to conjure up cobra helicopters and backfire bombers from biblical locusts (I can't bring myself to provide a link to Hal Lindsey's or Tim LaHaye's various speculative prophecy books. But here's a link to something more worthwhile anyway.) Therefore, I think it is entirely possible that they calculated Jesus' birth in the same way that Chilton did, and timed their attack to reflect a strike at the very heart (or root) of Cristendom.
Of course it's also possible that they were making purely pragmatic decisions about flights, fuel loads, et cetera. But if that's the case, then they appear to have stumbled upon a symbolic time far more meaningful than any they've ever cooked up purposely.
For those of you who are fans of December 25, Chilton in fairness points out in the next footnote that "Jupiter, recognized by Jews and Gentiles alike as the 'Planet of the Messiah:' was located in Virgo’s womb and standing still, directly over Bethlehem, on December 25, 2 B. C., when the Child was a little over a year old." Chilton seems to want to tie that date to the arrival of the Magi.
Hat Tip to my brother, Kevin, who took the time to read a long footnote in a 700 page book.
Oh, and just to tip the odds a little further away from coincidence, September 11, 3 B.C. was also the first day of Rosh Hashanah, the Day of Trumpets, which celebrates the enthronement of Messiah as King of Kings.
Next time…I'll identify the antich—aw, come on!

